VENTURE 17             - Private Education for the Medical Arts and Sciences

What Doctors Don't Know About The Drugs They Prescribe


Introduction by Dr. C. M. Counce:

Many of my students have heard my lectures on "The Dark Side of Medicine". From grave robbing during the Renaissance to exposing African Americans to syphilis as a technique to study pathogenesis in the early twentieth century. Or how about Germany's Bayer Laboratories introducing Americans to Heroin as a so-called non addictive cough medicine in 1895. Let's not forget the current "dirty organ" trade?  And of course, need I remind you of all that was done by Nazi doctors for twelve years, and the data we gleaned and kept from the patients they tortured?

"Medicine" has a clear history of occasionally doing things the wrong way, fixing it, hiding it, then moving on and not letting on. Here is a commentary from Dr. Ben Goldacre, author of the books, "Bad Pharma", and "Bad Science", regarding the trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry and its hold on doctors, from The Huffington Post and TEDTalks.

TEDTalks can sometimes portray science in triumphalist tones, with fabulous innovations that are changing the world forever. But the real action in science is often around dirty, messy, angry problems, and my TEDTalk is about the dirtiest I've seen yet.

Doctors need the results of clinical trials to make informed choices, with their patients, about which treatment to use. But the best currently available evidence estimates that half of all clinical trials, for the treatments we use today, have never been published. This problem is the same for industry-sponsored trials and independent academic studies, across all fields of medicine from surgery to oncology, and it represents an enormous hidden hole for everything we do.
Doctors can't make informed decisions, when half the evidence is missing. 

Most people react to this situation with incredulity, because it's so obviously absurd. How can medics [physicians], academics, and legislators have permitted such a huge problem to persist? The answer is simple. This territory has been policed, and aggressively, by the pharmaceutical industry. They have worked hard to shut down public discussion on the topic for several decades with great success.

They say, for example, that the problem is modest, and that critics have cherry-picked the evidence: but this is a lie. The best evidence comes from the most current review of all the literature, published in 2010. It estimates that half of all completed trials are left unpublished, and that trials with negative results are about twice as likely to be buried.

Then they pretend that the problem is in the past, and that everything has been fixed. But in reality, none of these supposed fixes were subject to any kind of routine public audit, and all have now been well-documented as failures. What's more, they all shared one simple loophole: they only demanded information about new trials, and this is hopeless. Anything that only gets us the results of studies completed after 2008 does nothing to fix medicine today, because more than 80% of all treatments prescribed this year came to the market more than ten years ago. We need the results of clinical trials from 2007, 2003, 1999, and 1993, to make informed decisions about the medicines we use today. This isn't about catching companies for past misdemeanors, it's a simple practical matter of making medicine optimally safe and effective.

The arguments go on, with ever more red herrings: industry spokespeople pretend that information about trials, such as Clinical Study Reports, can't be released without breaching the confidentiality of individual patient participants. But in reality, the EU Ombudsman has already forced the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to release hundreds of these exact same documents. He stated clearly that the administrative burden of removing any individual patient information is minimal. Next, they claim the cost of sharing trial information is prohibitive: but both the EMA and GSK have committed to releasing all the Clinical Study Reports that they have, and the EMA has already shared millions of pages of documents, quite happily. Sometimes industry people even claim, in hugely patronizing tones, that it's better for only regulators to see trial results, behind closed doors, because the public would panic if exposed to dissenting views.

There's more. Sometimes they pretend that the academic journals are the bad guys, for rejecting papers with negative results, when the evidence shows this was barely ever an issue, and, in any case, there are now endless open access journals, specifically designed to accept negative results. Then there are the hole-pickers: people who pay lip service to the problem, with a brief claim that they are "on your side," then expend all their worldly effort trying to pour cold water on the problem, pretending that things aren't so bad after all.

Nassim Taleb, author of The Black Swan, once laughingly told me that every page of my book Bad Pharma was infused with paranoia: that he could tell I'd been made furious by having the same argument about missing data, over and again, with chancers; that I had resorted to obsessively covering every exit in the argument with snipers, to hem the enemy in, across hundreds of pages. I admit I am obsessed, and I hope you'll share those details: if not by reading the book, then at least by inhaling the eight page briefing we have produced for our campaign, at

Because this is where I have to confront my inner grouch, and cave in to the optimism of TED. I have to tell you about the successful campaign for trials transparency that has grown since this talk first went up.

In the UK, last October, almost as soon as Bad Pharma was published, there were questions on withheld trial results in parliament, including a Prime Minister's Question (which David Cameron simply dodged). This led to widespread editorials, comment pieces, and news coverage in the London Times and elsewhere. A group of us, myself and some properly eminent UK medics, had a meeting with the Health Minister. The UK parliament's Health Select Committee called on the GMC, NICE, and the pharmaceutical industry to address the problem of missing trials; the Public Accounts Committee are looking at the withheld data on Tamiflu; and the Science and Technology Committee have now commenced a formal parliamentary inquiry into the problem of withheld results more widely.

In January, the science writer Simon Singh grew frustrated at my whining that things weren't moving fast enough, and gave a generous donation to the campaigning charity Sense About Science. This kickstarted some more traditional lobbying. We teamed up with the great and good journal editors, academics, and a knight -- to form the campaign.

AllTrials asks people to sign up to two simple things: firstly, recognize that this is an ongoing problem; and secondly, call for the release of basic information (including brief summary results, and the long "Clinical Study Report" where available) for all trials, on all treatments currently in use, whether past or future.

This has grown almost faster than we can. Over 40,000 individuals have signed up, and over 200 organizations. More than a hundred patient groups have committed their support, recognizing that it's their members who participate in trials, and take medicines based on their results. We are now supported by almost all medical and academic professional bodies in the UK -- the Royal Colleges, the Societies and Faculties -- not to mention the National Physicians Alliance from the U.S., and the European Public Health Association. The outsider position in the UK is now not supporting the AllTrials campaign.

In February, GlaxoSmithKline, one of the biggest drug companies in the world, signed up, and committed to publicly release all their Clinical Study Reports, going back to the beginning of the company. More companies are discussing signing, and if these promises are delivered, they could finally add an interesting new element to the game: for the first time ever, I believe there will be commercial incentives to transparency. Imagine that there are two treatments, both with apparently equal benefits. One is made by a company that shares all its results, but the other is made by a company that publicly mocks and derides the very notion that doctors and patients should dare to ask for such a thing. Which treatment do you want?

I think the answer is clear, but we need more than this. We need public engagement on the issue, and wider recognition among policy makers, to get on with concrete solutions. That's why I hope you'll sign up to, and if you're a member of a professional body anywhere in the world, then please get them to sign too. If you're from a company, then we are very happy to talk informally -- and confidentially -- about any anxieties you may have, but please, save your reputations, and sign.

The current state of affairs is absurd. We can spend tens of millions of dollars on just one trial, hoping to ensure it is free from bias, and trying to accurately detect tiny differences between one treatment and another. And yet we let all those biases right back in, by allowing people to bury half the data. Future generations will look back at our tolerating this bizarre situation in astonishment, the same way that we look back on medieval bloodletting. The time is now, to fix it forever, easily.

About the Author:

Dr. Ben Michael Goldacre is a British physician, academician, science writer, and author of the two well known industry books, "Bad Science", and "Bad Pharma". Dr. Goldacre is Wellcome Research Fellow in Epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

41 Comments to What Doctors Don't Know About The Drugs They Prescribe:

Comments RSS
process essay topics on Saturday, April 27, 2013 1:15 AM
In a description essay, you write about what a person, place, or thing is like.
Reply to comment
Zeltiq NYC on Monday, May 6, 2013 11:42 PM
Your post is very interesting and very useful,though we don't have much knowledge about the medical terms ,so its important to take drug after prescribed by a good doctor.

laser eye correction on Sunday, October 6, 2013 11:12 PM
All the information you shared with us about such topic was really useful and informational. Thanks for discussing with us that.

breast reduction melbourne on Monday, April 29, 2013 6:51 AM
It is really a very serious matter and everyone should understand and aware about the prescription drug and its side effects.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Monday, April 29, 2013 12:56 PM
Thank you very much for your comments.

hdc galaxy s4 plus on Sunday, May 12, 2013 7:52 PM
I'm complaining, but slow loading instances times will often affect your placement in google and could damage your quality score if advertising and marketing with Adwords. Anyway I am adding this RSS to my email and can look out for a lot more of your respective exciting content. Make sure you update this again soon..
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Sunday, May 12, 2013 9:30 PM
Thank you for your comments, Kevin.

self defense supplies on Monday, May 20, 2013 1:35 AM
Hey Every one how are you currently doinging. hope you are haveing an awesome day As I site possessor I believe the content matter here is rattling excellent , appreciate it for your hard work. You should keep it up forever! Best of luck.
Reply to comment

skin cancer checks on Monday, May 20, 2013 3:28 AM
I also read you book A COMMENTARY ON THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY that was fabulous and i know lots of things about the pharmaceutical company which is very nice. thanks for the nice book..
Reply to comment

Louis Vuitton iPhone 5 Case on Monday, May 20, 2013 9:12 PM
Yo! Superb weblog! I have been a ordinary visitor to your site (much like addict ) of this website although I had a a doubt. I am just in no way confident whether it is the right site to question, but you have no spam comments. I get comments day after day. Possibly can you assist me? Gives thanks!
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:48 AM
Hi, We do get our fair share of spam, but because we are a charitable teaching site, we have been fortunate to draw traffic which includes educated individuals like yourself who are genuinely interested in education and the biomedical fields. Our web-hoster is also very tight, which affords us a clean site. We very much appreciate your positive comments and critiques, Kevin. Let us know what we can help you with.

is ivory research reliable on Wednesday, June 5, 2013 1:28 AM
Imagine that there are two treatments, both with apparently equal benefits.
Reply to comment

guicci iphone 5 case on Tuesday, June 25, 2013 1:31 AM
I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon. After study a few of the blog posts on your website now, and I truly like your way of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark website list and will be checking back soon.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Wednesday, June 26, 2013 2:04 PM
Again, thank you, Kevin, for your great comments.

hospedagem on Monday, July 8, 2013 2:11 AM
A solid re-boot to the legendary character and franchise: good story, direction, and acting... too bad an epic battle had to get in the way."
Reply to comment

rockville md dentist on Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:30 AM
Clinical trial are very essential to get the appropriate results in order to resolve the problem causing symptoms.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Friday, July 19, 2013 5:22 PM
Thank you very much.

Find orthodontist in NYC on Friday, July 19, 2013 8:19 AM
I also heard your lecture on "The Dark Side of Medicine"I always want to listen your lectures as they are always commendable.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Friday, July 19, 2013 5:23 PM
Thank you for your comments and feedback. More to come.

Ray Ban Online on Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:24 PM
I agree your opinion, Thank you for your post, Your post is very good.
Reply to comment

Plastic surgeon in gold coast on Tuesday, August 13, 2013 3:07 AM
Fantastic blog post and very useful information regarding the doctors and the drugs which they are prescribing.I must appreciate the brilliant work by brilliant writer.Keep blogging.Best of luck.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Sunday, September 1, 2013 9:31 PM
Thank you very much.

click here for more informations on Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:33 AM
I believe I’ll become a frequent visitor to your site! I enjoy your in depth posts about this subject and I enjoy the fact you are so knowledgeable about this subject. !!!
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Sunday, September 1, 2013 9:32 PM
Thank you for your very nice comment.

Naturopathy Course Online on Friday, August 23, 2013 12:26 AM
Yes, it is true that many doctors don't know what exactly the problem is? And they prescribe medicine for that. I don't want to say that they don't have much knowledge to find out the problem. But I want to say that sometime they failed to estimate the root cause for the problem and they prescribe medicine for that. If our problem still persists then they change the medicines. So, this is sort of drug trial.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Sunday, September 1, 2013 9:33 PM
I agree. Thank you very much for your educated comment.

rsa certificate on Wednesday, August 28, 2013 1:15 AM
I am happy that I found your post regarding the education of science. The education model should be more effective for the students on drugs prescription.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Sunday, September 1, 2013 9:34 PM
Thank you very much for following us.

Dr. Counce on Sunday, September 1, 2013 9:30 PM
Thank you.
Reply to comment

OBD 2 Diagnosescanner on Monday, September 9, 2013 8:50 PM
This is a very good article, others may not think so, but it seems to me it really is a wonderful article.DEMI
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:50 PM
Thank you very much.

mecose mold on Monday, November 18, 2013 8:23 PM
mecose mold is China's largest manufacturers and suppliers, the company's products are mainly covered medical molds and precision molds, another company's plastic injection molding technology is relatively mature, expect talk to each line communication.
Reply to comment

Browlift process on Thursday, March 6, 2014 11:00 PM
That's the very nice post you have shared with us. I really like it. Please keep sharing more and more information on drugs prescribe by doctor.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Tuesday, April 1, 2014 11:34 AM
Thank you very much.

Cellulite Reduction in Sydney on Friday, March 7, 2014 12:18 AM
Very cool blog on drugs prescribed by doctor.!! Guy .. Excellent .. Superb .. I’ll bookmark your web site and take the feed additionally…I’m happy to locate so much helpful info here within the post. Thank you for sharing.
Reply to comment
Dr. Counce on Tuesday, April 1, 2014 11:35 AM
Thank you very much for your readership.

adres internetowy on Friday, August 1, 2014 11:24 PM
A fine expert is aware of what your dog is going through without fail us It is performed because hemp as well as solid, specifically strings, that happens to be an indispensable ingredient in
Reply to comment on Monday, December 15, 2014 5:31 PM
Your advices are really great and important for everyone!
Reply to comment

fghfgh on Sunday, March 5, 2017 9:25 PM
Reply to comment

Monice Mundra on Monday, February 8, 2021 3:35 AM
Thank you for this insightful post. Pharmaceutical companies also affect prescribing behavior through various means, including pharmaceutical salespeople (drug reps), drug samples, influential peers, and educational events. I also believe that Drug samples are among the most effective marketing tools that companies have. Being an Indian, I have switched to using ayurvedic supplements like ashwagandha and yoga to keep myself fit and healthy.
Reply to comment

fortnitelaptops on Wednesday, March 3, 2021 5:25 AM
You never fail until you stop trying.
Reply to comment

Add a Comment

Your Name:
Email Address: (Required)
Make your text bigger, bold, italic and more with HTML tags. We'll show you how.
Post Comment